trismugistus.com digital-bondage.net writing reviews links

easy nav bar

 

home

 

walls

 

writing

 

reviews

 

 

anime

 

 

manga

>

>

tv&films

 

links
 

about

trismugistus.com and digital-bondage.net are my web sites.

trismugistus.com is where I upload my anime, manga and tv&film reviews, and also where I occasionally post short stories and longer works I've written.

digital-bondage.net is my wallpaper site and provides anime, manga and other desktop wallpapers in a variety of resolutions. I also have a few tutorials and some resources, such as psds for you to download.

I also run a site called scan-city.org, which provides scans from the latest japanese anime magazines for you to download and use in your wallpapers.

You can also read my blog here or check out my anime list here.

 

blade trinity review

go to details

go to opinion

go to summary

details

The Genre: Action/Horror

The Format: DVD

ooh, groovy

The plot: A ramped-up techno soundtrack bleats out adrenaline-pumping action tunes while leather-clad vampire slayers smash through walls and floors and ceilings, break windows with their bodies, and occasionally defy gravity. Cascades of flying glass sparkle in the air and crimson pools of blood shine on the floors of warehouse dens where the hungry creatures hide. This is BLADE: TRINITY, the third instalment of the film series adapted from Marvel comics. Here, a new challenge faces the preternaturally sharp hunter, Blade, when a group of vamps resurrect the long-slumbering 'Drake' - the ancient and all-powerful Count Dracula - and Blade meets the ultimate opponent.

back to top

opinion

The hell?

I must admit to being a bit of a sneaky big-time fan of the first two Blade films. The first, especially, oozed style and panache and I think rates right up there as being one of the best comic-book related films ever made.

The central Blade character is where it’s mainly at for me. I never quite got the whistler thing, and it seemed to obey too many comic book related clichés and was the source of much in the way of cheese. But these parts were easily ignored in favour of the Wesley Snipes looking all cool and stuff and putting some serious smack down on some vampiric arse bits.

Speaking of the vampires, they have also been a key element of the preceding Blade films. Admittedly they maybe headed on over into a gothy vibe a smidge too often, but to me this just adds charm. Vampires need to have gothicy stuff to them, just as they need to have heavy sexuality.

Because that’s what vampires are all about - Sex and Death.

And the first two Blade films delivered on these. They also had appropriate use of bad guys. In the first it was a conspiracy kinda thing with a main bad guy who was just a plain old vamp, but had more than a smidge of ambition.

The second went down the more traditional comic book route of having a super-vamp as its bad guy. But that was all right - his origins were fully explained and they made sense; there was also an element of conspiracy and betrayal and he looked fairly human for the most part as well.

But this is supposed to be a review of the third film, right? So why am I blathering on about the first two?

The reason is that the first two tell you just exactly what’s wrong with this third one.

First off, Blade is almost not in the film. Maybe Wesley was getting a bit tired of doing them. Maybe the writer had run out of ideas. Whatever the reason, this feels less like the third Blade film and more like a film that happens to have him in it.

Next up is that the Whistler character forms a big focus of the story. I don’t care about him. I don’t give a crap that he has a daughter, or that Blade clearly has some sort of father-figure thing going on with him. Neither am I particularly fussed if he dies or not - hell he’s already died, like, a dozen times in the previous films and here he is, popping up in the next one.

Last on the list are the vamps. The vamps are the basic-grade bad guys. We need them to be super-cool and we need them to be super-sexy. It also helps if there are plenty of them for Blade to kill and that they keep the mundane henchmaning to a bare minimum.

huh?

They fail to really make many of these. They’re not particularly bad in Blade Trinity, we’ve seen them do most of the things they do here before, and they really aren’t all that sexy. Ah yes, and the henchman thing.

Guess what happens in Blade Trinity? They revive the big lad himself, good old Dracula.

Oh dear.

It breaks my heart when they try and re-invent the classic characters like Dracula. I think to myself, “Oh no, please don’t do that.” But they do. Cos he’s a name. You know who he is.

But then they proceed to fuck with him. They make him not Vlad the Impaler or they make him able to walk in the daylight, or they make him immune to garlic, or some other shit. It’s just not on in my book, and here we see all of these classic mistakes played out in big style.

it's a big gun

But also since we’ve got Dracula in the film we can’t have the other vamps being the focus can we? Even though they’re the more interesting characters.

So we’re onto a downer here from the off, and things don’t get much better when you realise what it is they’ve replaced Blade with. They’ve replaced him with some sort of super team. In traditional team-based comic book style we have things like a character who’s a weapons making nerd to give them all cool gadgets (think Q from Bond) but we also have a nerdy biologist character for plot-advancement type activity.

Then we have two brawler characters - one male with a wisecracking past that hides a damaged past and the other female. She’s the aforementioned Whistlers daughter. Well done that guy, you certainly managed to raise a daughter who knows how to put a whole in people.

And speaking of daughters we have a peril-ready young daughter type person kicking about. Yes, that’s right, in other words we have a portion of super-cheese to add to our portion of Dracula cheese. And for me that’s just too much cheese to handle.

Now what else is there?

wuhuh?

Oh yeah, there’s the almost total lack of any real plot. Things just sort of happen for no apparent reason and this Dracula bloke seems quite content to ponce around in some big office building without any real kind of plan of action to deal with Blade.

As masters of all things evil go he’s pretty damn weak.

He also seems to run away a lot. In fact, he spends the entire film running away from someone. What the hell is that all about? Dracula running away from people. Yeah, that makes sense.

Lastly a special mention has to go out to the direction. It’s poor. Very poor.

The action is often times difficult to follow, poor use is made of the camera and the whole thing feels wooden and slow moving. It also somehow manages to make the film kinda boring and predictable. Now considering the writer -who was the same writer that did the first two films - directed it this is somewhat surprising. Clearly sticking to the day job is the order of the day here.

I could go on, but I’m getting almost as sick writing this as a I did watching it.

Oh no, wait; I forgot to mention the films one saving grace.

The humour. It’s rather unexpected I admit, but the jokes the blokey cracks are actually really quite funny in places. Indeed, his relationship with Blade is the almost singular diamond in the otherwise sandpaper-grade toilet paper roughness that is this poor excuse for a movie.

There are plenty of extras on the disc too, if you can stomach watching them after your intelligence, common sense and fandom have been so roundly butt-fucked.

back to top

summary

The Summary: Not so good.

The Score: 1/5

The Pictures:

(click for larger versions)

click for larger image

back to top

home | reviews | films&tv

friends

uk-a
animepaper
devart
urbis
 

my sites

trismugistus.com
digital-bondage.net
scan-city.org
 

my stuff

trigs@AP
trigs@devart
trigs@urbis
my blog
my anime list
 
babe
 

v5 © Mark Sunderland